Should Mark Zuckerberg Give Access to Metas Internal Research on Child and Teen Mental Health?

Mark Zuckerberg created a controversy in 2018 when he decided to give access to the data of 2.2 million users to researchers. This decision was made after Mark discovered that child and teen mental health had not been given enough attention. We at the Student Council USA believe that this decision is worth making due to the knowledge it could provide. The data would help to improve child and teen mental health as a whole, as well as help to find new solutions for the problem.

Should Mark Zuckerberg Give Access to Meta's Internal Research on Child and Teen Mental Health? Poll and arguments for yes.

Child and teen mental health is as important as physical health.

Not addressing child and teen mental health can lead to social issues that could have a negative impact on the user's life. For this reason, the user's physical health should be prioritized. By sharing the data, Meta can help to solve this problem and improve the mental health of children and teens all over the world. This would save taxpayers' money by reducing social issues and government spending on solutions. The data could also help train professionals who work with children and teens, such as teachers, counsellors or therapists. Meta's research could help to improve child and teen mental health, which would benefit everyone.

Meta's research could help to improve child and teen mental health.

The data shared by Mark would let researchers examine how mental health issues affect children and teens and find solutions for them. For example, if researchers found that users under 13 were having the same problems as users over 13, that would be useful information for train professionals. Knowing about these problems ahead of time would help them create solutions for their students so they don't have to use Meta's research after they're already adults.

Should Mark Zuckerberg Give Access to Meta's Internal Research on Child and Teen Mental Health? Poll and arguments for no.

Giving access to Meta's internal research would expose users to dangerous information.

Users who are not prepared for this information may become victims of predators or false information. For this reason, it is important to have safeguards in place when sharing this kind of information. For example, some governments have mandatory reporting systems where people must tell someone responsible for handling child and teen mental health information so predators can be stopped before they do harm.

It could be a negative experience for users to read about their own mental health problems.

Some people may think that they are not good enough or not important if they are not the only person having these issues. Sharing this information could make people feel less confident in themselves and make them feel like there is nothing they can do about it.

Despite scepticism, Meta's research could help to improve child and teen mental health. The data shared by Mark could provide new information on child and teen mental health issues and help train professionals who work with children and teens already has an impact on how they should grow up feeling confident in themselves. Since most governments have mandatory reporting systems where people must tell someone responsible for handling child and teen mental health information so predators can be stopped before they do harm, sharing this kind of important information is still worth it even with safeguards in place.

So, we wanted to know your asnwer for theme Should Mark Zuckerberg Give Access to Meta's Internal Research on Child and Teen Mental Health? Poll. Take part in this survey and discussion